• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


Thinking About Going Back to Stock Exhaust

SrsBsns

Active member
Messages
657
Likes
695
Location
San Diego
#1
I've been thinking, for a while now, about going back to the stock exhaust.

The previous owner installed an MBRP exhaust and I really like it most of the time, but I'm so tired of the drone. I feel like I need earplugs, and that's a lot coming from me because I normally have a pretty high tolerance for this kind of stuff.

I don't really want to go back to stock since I do like having an nice exhaust note and I'm worried that I'm going to lose all sound with the stocker.

Before I go back to stock, is there anything that I could do to the MBRP to help to eliminate the drone?

If I do go back, would a muffler delete/resonator delete/both put me back in the same boat?
 


Messages
19
Likes
13
Location
Liverpool, UK
#2
I have a centre resonator delete and it's great sounds amazing, burbles now and then but it doesn't drone. Back box deletes are too loud IMO

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 


Messages
579
Likes
461
Location
San Jose
#3
Everyone is a bit different, but I don’t think that the Ecoboost 4 cylinders engines sound particularly good especially once uncorked. That said I also felt the stock exhaust made it a little too pedestrian. I agree resonator delete is the best bet for not a lot of money. It’s still quiet, just more growl-y, and I can occasionally get a single back fire on aggressive rev matched downshifts which I also count as a positive since most crackle tunes make it sound stupidly obnoxious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Fiestig

Active member
Messages
749
Likes
779
Location
Pacific Grove, CA, USA
#4
Is there any reason you don't want to simply do some sound deadening? I sound deadened mine quite extensively. There is still a bit of drone but nothing compared to what it was previously. MAPerformace 2.5"

Ideally you would want to do some simple deadening under the headliner as well. That would cut the drone quite a bit more.

20190225_143617.jpg
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Messages
904
Likes
786
Location
San Juan, Puerto Rico
#5
I've been thinking, for a while now, about going back to the stock exhaust.

The previous owner installed an MBRP exhaust and I really like it most of the time, but I'm so tired of the drone. I feel like I need earplugs, and that's a lot coming from me because I normally have a pretty high tolerance for this kind of stuff.

I don't really want to go back to stock since I do like having an nice exhaust note and I'm worried that I'm going to lose all sound with the stocker.

Before I go back to stock, is there anything that I could do to the MBRP to help to eliminate the drone?

If I do go back, would a muffler delete/resonator delete/both put me back in the same boat?
My plan in the future with the MBRP is adding a Ultraquiet resonator from Vibrant. Either changing the one it comes with or adding to it I don't know yet cause space is limited.
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Messages
904
Likes
786
Location
San Juan, Puerto Rico
#6
Is there any reason you don't want to simply do some sound deadening? I sound deadened mine quite extensively. There is still a bit of drone but nothing compared to what it was previously. MAPerformace 2.5"

Ideally you would want to do some simple deadening under the headliner as well. That would cut the drone quite a bit more.

View attachment 33733
Only small drawback is that you're adding a little bit of weight. some sound deadeners are thicker and heavier than others. But it might be maybe 15lbs total?
 


Fiestig

Active member
Messages
749
Likes
779
Location
Pacific Grove, CA, USA
#7
Only about 4-5lbs worth max for the entire car if you use the closed cell foam type which is great for absorption.

Butyl on the other hand is quite heavy
 


OP
SrsBsns

SrsBsns

Active member
Messages
657
Likes
695
Location
San Diego
Thread Starter #8
Is there any reason you don't want to simply do some sound deadening? I sound deadened mine quite extensively. There is still a bit of drone but nothing compared to what it was previously. MAPerformace 2.5"

Ideally you would want to do some simple deadening under the headliner as well. That would cut the drone quite a bit more.
I actually do have some sound deadening. PO took the door panels off and installed it there, as well as in the hatch, like in your picture. The drone at 80mph (2.5K-4K rpm) is still pretty gnarly at times. That said, I haven't really examined how far the deadening goes, so maybe I just need to add some in the right places.
 


OP
SrsBsns

SrsBsns

Active member
Messages
657
Likes
695
Location
San Diego
Thread Starter #9
Everyone is a bit different, but I don’t think that the Ecoboost 4 cylinders engines sound particularly good especially once uncorked. That said I also felt the stock exhaust made it a little too pedestrian. I agree resonator delete is the best bet for not a lot of money. It’s still quiet, just more growl-y, and I can occasionally get a single back fire on aggressive rev matched downshifts which I also count as a positive since most crackle tunes make it sound stupidly obnoxious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I'm not crazy about the super loud exhausts on the FiST. It doesn't sound bad, but I think I would like a better compromise. Do you have any sound clips of your car with the resonator delete?
 


Fiestig

Active member
Messages
749
Likes
779
Location
Pacific Grove, CA, USA
#10
I actually do have some sound deadening. PO took the door panels off and installed it there, as well as in the hatch, like in your picture. The drone at 80mph (2.5K-4K rpm) is still pretty gnarly at times. That said, I haven't really examined how far the deadening goes, so maybe I just need to add some in the right places.
I actually have a second layer of closed cell in the hatch area. That made quite a difference. With the seats in it is quite quiet. I drive around with typically just drivers seat only and it is not as bad as undeadened stock with seats in.
 


Messages
306
Likes
338
Location
Virginia
#11
I've been thinking, for a while now, about going back to the stock exhaust.

The previous owner installed an MBRP exhaust and I really like it most of the time, but I'm so tired of the drone. I feel like I need earplugs, and that's a lot coming from me because I normally have a pretty high tolerance for this kind of stuff.

I don't really want to go back to stock since I do like having an nice exhaust note and I'm worried that I'm going to lose all sound with the stocker.

Before I go back to stock, is there anything that I could do to the MBRP to help to eliminate the drone?

If I do go back, would a muffler delete/resonator delete/both put me back in the same boat?
MBRP's is one of the loudest options from what I've heard (which isn't shocking given it's just a single resonator at the downpipe). You don't have to go all the way back to stock to get rid of drone. I think Cobb's exhaust is the best "no drone" with a good, deep sound that isn't too obnoxious. I'm currently running the Thermal R&D which gets fairly loud under power, but quiets down a lot when off throttle.

Though the cheapest option would probably be to get an exhaust shop to modify the MBRP by adding another resonator, or a muffler if you want to quiet it down even further.
 


RubenZZZ

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,436
Likes
915
Location
El Monte
#12
What about adding a glass pack where the resonator is? Or a magnaflow bullet muffler instead of the resonator?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Messages
306
Likes
338
Location
Virginia
#13
What about adding a glass pack where the resonator is? Or a magnaflow bullet muffler instead of the resonator?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MBRP's resonator is right behind the downpipe, which isn't a great place to put a muffler.
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Messages
904
Likes
786
Location
San Juan, Puerto Rico
#14
What about adding a glass pack where the resonator is? Or a magnaflow bullet muffler instead of the resonator?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I used to have a 2.5"exaust made with a Magnaflow Bullet, was almost just as loud as the MBRP which is much bigger. Added a Vibrant Ultra Quiet at the back and it worked wonders. with the MBRP long exhaust tips there is barely any space back there.
 


PunkST

2000 Post Club
Messages
2,239
Likes
1,413
Location
Menasha
#15
Are you on poly hangers?

My best combo seems to be the greddy catback, factory cat, and factory hangers. The cobb ones ate way too stiff and transmit a lot of vibration right into the chassis playing it like a drum.
 


Messages
227
Likes
398
Location
Poway, CA
#16
Best bet is to add a muffler or resonator like other have said. Ed Hansen's in Spring Valley is the place to go if you can get there. He's not open Saturdays unfortunately

I'm very happy with my Thermal. Worth every penny if you're willing to spend the $$. I switched to it from my Flowmaster and it made the car much more enjoyable. And the Flowmaster didn't even drone, it was just kind of loud.
 


Erick_V

Active member
Messages
760
Likes
888
Location
San Antonio
#18
I knew there was a thread about fixing the MBRP drone, I finally found it. @Clint Beastwood has a thread where he added a helmholtz resonator and it seems to have helped. Cost of doing the Vibrant Res and Helmholtz is where I'm torn. I couldn't put the stock exhaust on after having the MBRP, the lack of noise would drive me insane lol

Mentioned thread: https://www.fiestastforum.com/threads/im-at-it-again-fixing-drone-on-a-brand-new-mbrp.20873/
 


Messages
32
Likes
15
Location
Los Alamitos, CA, USA
#19

M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Messages
14,103
Likes
6,755
Location
Princeton, N.J.
#20


Top